![]() 12/03/2015 at 13:56 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Interesting idea!
![]() 12/03/2015 at 14:03 |
|
Why couldn’t they just sleeve it? Like we’ve been doing for the last 80 years.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 14:12 |
|
I dunno. I think it applies beyond cylinder linings, tho the article does specifically mention that application.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 14:16 |
|
I know they do this on the 5.0 coyote motors when there new. Maybe there looking at a way to rebuild the current crop of motors cheaply. I’ve heard the coyote ain’t cheap to sleeve.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 14:44 |
|
should work, hey Nissan is refurbing old F150s and slapping a Nissan badge on them.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 15:02 |
|
Is this just for their remanufactured crate engines and warranty repairs? Or are they looking to put these in brand-new vehicles, too?
![]() 12/03/2015 at 15:40 |
|
The article says that it’s a process that’s being used on new engines currently, but Ford’s plan is to use it on used engines. Now, to what extent “used” the article doesn’t say, but I would assume vintage/rebuilt engines (as a separate service), warranty repairs (if this particular treatment is applicable to the scenario), and as a performance upgrade for crate engines.
Again, only my assumption.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 22:23 |
|
you can run into problems with sleeving if there isn’t sufficient thickness between the cylinders. There is also the issue with differnt expansion rates of different metals.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 22:39 |
|
Cool Though the process isn’t cheap. yet it could give a cost reduction in eliminating the need for a highly precise sleeves. Just clean, blast, and machine the surface.
It’s been done in the aircraft industry for decades.
One variation of the technology even has the nozzle produce shock diamonds.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 22:42 |
|
kinja wont let me edit the benefit is that you don’t have to buy 4, 6, or 8 machined sleeves.
![]() 12/04/2015 at 05:53 |
|
Yeah just found out sleeving a coyote isn’t cheap.